NBA All-Star Weekend grades for dunk contest, Increasing Stars, more

It’s NBA All-Star Weekend, however not all the stars will shine similarly. To highlight the very best and worst efficiencies all weekend long in Indianapolis, we’re grading the individuals in every occasion from the Increasing Stars on Friday through Sunday’s All-Star Video game.


Abilities took spotlight on Saturday night throughout NBA All-Star Weekend, consisting of an unique face-off in between WNBA 3-point contest record holder Sabrina Ionescu of the New York City Liberty and NBA all-time 3-point leader Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors, a two-time NBA 3-point contest winner who shares the single-round NBA record. Curry won with the very best round by any gamer all night long.

Saturday’s occasions started with the abilities difficulty. The present format has groups of 3 complete in a barrier course, a passing competitors and a shooting competitors. The home town Indiana Pacers team of All-Star Tyrese Haliburton, Increasing Stars MVP Bennedict Mathurin and Myles Turner thrilled the crowd by ending up being the 3rd host group in as several years to win.

In the 3-point contest, safeguarding champ Damian Lillard of the Milwaukee Bucks beat 2022 winner Karl-Anthony Towns and Trae Young in the finals, ending up being the very first gamer to repeat considering that Jason Kapono in 2007 and 2008 and signing up with Curry as one of simply 8 gamers ever to win several times.

The action concluded with the dunk contest, where Mac McClung won his 2nd straight title over a field including All-Star Jaylen Brown of the NBA-best Boston Celtics and novices Jaime Jaquez Jr and Jacob Toppin

Which stars amazed in Indy? Let’s grade every All-Star Saturday night individual.

Dive to grades: Increasing Stars| Abilities| 3-point| Dunks| Steph vs. Sabrina

ALL-STAR SATURDAY NIGHT


Dunk contest

Mac McClung, Osceola Magic
Grade:
A-

Outcome: Champ

Analysis
Although McClung was a deserving winner, the excitement of in 2015’s unanticipated triumph wasn’t there this time around. McClung set the bar high in 2023, when 3 of his 4 dunks scored an ideal 50. This time around, McClung did head out on a strong note with the night’s just 50 for his reverse surface over Shaq– who didn’t duck almost as much as he did when the taller Jaime Jaquez Jr soaked over him previously in the competitors.

McClung likewise soaked over a set of individuals (one on the other’s shoulders) in the last, however I most enjoyed his last dunk of the preliminary. That a person saw McClung increase with 2 hands, then windmill into a reverse surface. McClung’s least expensive rating came for a dunk that was likely harder than it looked, when he released the ball midair, then got it once again and carried out a reverse surface on his 2nd effort. The crowd booed a rating of 48.0.


Jaylen Brown, Boston Celtics
Grade: B-

Outcome: Runner-up

Analysis
The evaluating panel appeared more enamored of Brown’s dunks than outdoors observers were. He reached the finals with a dunk which saw him take a lob from colleague Jayson Tatum and dive over a sitting Kai Cenat (recording for his popular YouTube channel) in what was planned as a homage to Dee Brown, who won the 1991 dunk contest for the Boston Celtics. Unfortunately, Brown’s effort to cover his eyes as Dee Brown notoriously did on his last dunk came just after the ball had actually gone through the web.

A number of Brown’s dunks, consisting of a pump followed by a windmill that scored a 48.8 and a 360 windmill that scored a 48.6, were the kind periodically seen throughout video game action. Brown did stir feelings with the latter dunk by commemorating the late Terrence Clarke, a Kentucky star who passed away in a cars and truck mishap while getting ready for the 2021 draft. Brown has actually called Clarke, who was from the Boston location, ” my little sibling.”


Jaime Jaquez Jr., Miami Heat
Grade: B-

Outcome: Removed in preliminary

Analysis
Not truly considered a dunker, Jaquez showcased his vertical on his opening dunk, jumping a ducking O’Neal– who was recording at the time– and windmilling home. Jaquez’s 2nd dunk, which featured him using a “Heat Culture” hat, did not have the exact same imagination. Jaquez lobbed the ball to himself for what wasn’t rather a 360, drawing the most affordable rating of the preliminary after missing his very first effort.


Jacob Toppin, New York City Knicks
Grade: B-

Outcome: Removed in preliminary

Analysis

Toppin, who has actually seen action in 5 video games for the New york city Knicks on a two-way agreement as a novice, integrated his sibling– 2022 dunk contest winner Obi Toppin— into his opening dunk. Toppin got the ball off his sibling’s shoulders and ended up with a reverse. Toppin’s 2nd dunk, going in between his legs for a 360 with 2 hands, had a greater degree of trouble than Jaquez’s comparable effort however wasn’t enough to get him to the finals.


Steph vs. Sabrina

Stephen Curry
Grade: A
Outcome: 29 points

It didn’t take wish for Curry to advise everyone who’s the very best shooter in the structure. Although Curry last took part in the 3-point contest in 2021, winning his 2nd title, he ‘d be preferred to beat anybody, anywhere, at any time. After making simply 3 of 5 shots on the opening rack, Curry contended least 4-of-5 on his staying 4, consisting of best marks from both the left and extreme rights. Requiring to make 3 of 5 efforts on his last moneyball rack to win, Curry rather struck 4 to end up 2 points shy of connecting his record for a single round under the present format.


Sabrina Ionescu
Grade: A
Outcome: 26 points

In spite of losing the GOAT shooter belt to Steph, Ionescu acquitted herself well, shooting from the longer NBA 3-point line (utilizing basic WNBA basketballs). Like Curry and Lillard, Ionescu is a risk well beyond the arc, as she revealed by beginning with 13 makes in her very first 15 efforts. Ionescu might have tired a bit from there, making simply half of her last 10 shots, however still matched any round from the 3-point contest. The supreme takeaway: No matter the league, shooters shoot.


3-point contest

Malik Beasley, Milwaukee Bucks
Grade: C+
Outcome: Removed in preliminary (20 )

Under regular scenarios, you ‘d anticipate someone to come up except 20 points in the opening round of the 3-point contest. Beasley struck majority his shots, consisting of a deep 3, however can be found in last in big part since he went simply 2-of-5 from his moneyball rack on the extreme right.


Jalen Brunson, New York City Knicks
Grade: B
Outcome: Removed in preliminary (24 )

After a sluggish start, Brunson was agonizingly near becoming part of the tiebreaker, requiring simply another make on his cash rack to connect the leading rating of 26. Beginning in the left corner as the only southpaw in the competitors, Brunson went 1-of-5 on that rack however made all 5 of his efforts from the top of the essential and among the deep shots.


Tyrese Haliburton, Indiana Pacers
Grade: B+

Outcome: Removed in first-round tiebreaker (26/12)

Provide the NBA’s tiebreaker format an F. Rules are guidelines, however in a circumstance where the leading 4 gamers all had the exact same rating, letting them all advance to the finals would have made much more sense than removing Haliburton since he left to a reasonably sluggish start in a 30-second tiebreaker round. Haliburton, who connected the all-time high rating with an opening round of 31 in 2015 however did not win, once again lost in painful style.


Damian Lillard, Milwaukee Bucks
Grade: A
Outcome: Champ (26/16/26)

The 3-point contest stays “Dame Time.” Going last as the safeguarding champ, Lillard edged into a four-way tie by making all 5 of his efforts from the leading and his last 3 moneyball shots. He spared us drama in the tiebreaker, making a deep 3 to assist edge Haliburton, and after that matched his first-round overall for a win in the finals. This time, Lillard did sweat it out a bit, missing his very first 4 attempts from the best corner after matching Young’s overall before tearing down his last effort to repeat as champ.


Lauri Markkanen, Utah Jazz
Grade: B
Outcome: Removed preliminary (25 )

Markkanen will rue his positioning of the moneyball rack. Extremely, the left wing he picked was the only rack on which Markkanen did not struck a minimum of 4 shots. Markkanen got simply 2 additional points by going 2-of-5 from his cash rack, indicating he was removed regardless of making 19 of his 25 shot efforts.


Donovan Mitchell, Cleveland Cavaliers
Grade: C+

Outcome: Removed preliminary (21 )

Using the jersey of his colleague Sam “Cash” Merrill, who’s shooting 44% from 3-point variety this season, Mitchell began by making simply 2 of his 5 shots from the very first 2 racks– including his moneyball rack. Mitchell warmed up by making 4 of 5 from the top of the secret, in addition to his 2nd deep effort, however still wasn’t near reaching the finals.


Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Grade: A-

Outcome: Removed in finals ( 26/16/22)

Like Lillard, Towns was bidding to win a 2nd 3-point contest, which would have assisted seal his claim as the best shooting huge guy in NBA history. After scoring 26 in the opening round, Towns set a strong speed in the tiebreaker round by making all 5 of his moneyball shots from the left wing and 4 of 5 from the left corner, scoring 16 points. Towns’ speed slowed in the finals, where he ended up last of the 3 rivals.


Trae Young, Atlanta Hawks
Grade: A-

Outcome: Removed in finals (26/15/24)

After missing his very first 4 shots of the opening rack, Young hardly ever missed out on the remainder of the night, going 16-of-20 the rest of his preliminary– consisting of 5-of-5 on his moneyball rack– to sign up with the four-way tie for the leading rating. Young went 5-of-5 from a various moneyball rack on the left wing in the tiebreaker round, then installed a rating of 24 in the finals that quickly might have won the competitors.


Abilities contest

Group Pacers ( Tyrese Haliburton, Bennedict Mathurin, Myles Turner)
Grade: A

Outcome: Champ

Analysis
Feeding off their fans, the Pacers began taking things seriously, with Turner and Haliburton publishing the 2 fastest specific times in the relay, while Mathurin’s time likewise ranked in the leading 5. They worked overtime to win the tiebreaker and declare the passing competitors, guaranteeing a tie on points at worst. After completing last in shooting, Indiana rallied to win the half-court shooting tiebreaker with All-Star Haliburton fittingly providing the winning container.


Group All-Stars ( Scottie Barnes, Tyrese Maxey, Trae Young)
Grade: A-

Outcome: Runner-up

Analysis
After a bad start in the relay, when Maxey misinterpreted where he was expected to dribble and Barnes lost the ball out of bounds, the trio of All-Stars redeemed themselves in the next 2 competitors. They might have quickly won the passing competitors after planning where to target– they lost the tiebreaker by simply 2 points– and flee from the field in regards to shooting with Barnes publishing the very best rating of any gamer. Unfortunately, the All-Stars could not discover the variety from midcourt, requiring more than a minute to lastly make a shot and offering the Pacers excessive time.


Group No. 1 choices ( Paolo Banchero, Anthony Edwards, Victor Wembanyama)
Grade: D

Outcome: 3rd location

Analysis
From the start, the group of the previous 3 No. 1 selects did not appear to take the difficulty especially seriously. Banchero went the incorrect instructions on the challenge course quickly after Maxey made the exact same error. Then Edwards missed out on all 3 jumpers severely while shooting with his non-dominant left hand– surrendering any possibility at winning that round. The No. 1 selects ended up a remote 3rd in the passing competitors before rallying rather to end up 2nd in shooting.

INCREASING STARS


Group Jalen

Chet Holmgren, Oklahoma City Thunder
Grade: B

Video Game 1: 5 PTS|2-4 FG|3 REB|1 AST
Last: 2 PTS|0-0 FG|2 REB|1 BLK

Analysis
The leading choice for Group Jalen didn’t wind up playing the greatest function in his group’s triumph. Holmgren had 5 turnovers in the semifinals, when he compared with 2022 No. 1 choice Paolo Banchero and scored just at the complimentary toss line in the last. On the plus side, Holmgren two times drove previous Banchero on the border, as soon as for a running layup and the other drawing a nasty.


Jalen Williams, Oklahoma City Thunder
Grade: A-

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-1 FG|3 REB|3 AST
Last: 5 PTS|2-3 FG|1-2 3PT|3 AST

Analysis
Williams capably managed the function of point player for the appropriately called Group Jalen, giving out a game-high 3 helps in both the semifinals and the last. His only rating in the semifinals was the group’s opening basket, beginning a resurgence from a 10-0 deficit. Williams likewise topped the night’s scoring with a pull-up 3 to reach– and really exceed– the target rating and win the competition.


Bennedict Mathurin, Indiana Pacers
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 18 PTS|7-13 FG|2-4 3PT|2 REB
Last: 4 PTS|1-3 FG|2 AST|1 STL

Analysis
Mathurin redeemed himself for missing what might have been a set of game-winning complimentary tosses by making a pull-up jumper to reach the target rating in the firmly objected to semifinal win. Naturally, Group Jalen remained in that position just since of Mathurin’s takeover, which made him MVP honors.

Mathurin scored almost half of his group’s points in the semifinals, consistently getting to the rim and making a set of 3-pointers. Mathurin earned less sound in the last, where his finest play was a clever flip pass to Kessler for a layup.


Jeremy Sochan, San Antonio Spurs
Grade: C+

Video Game 1: 0 PTS|0-0 FG|2 REB
Last: 0 PTS|0-2 FG

Analysis
Using the border as part of a supersized Group Jalen beginning 5, Sochan was the group’s only gamer not to rating, missing out on both of his shot efforts.


Dereck Lively II, Dallas Mavericks
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 6 PTS|3-3 FG|2 REB
Last: 6 PTS|3-3 FG|1 AST

Analysis
Lively’s above-the-rim completing and determination to run the court were difference-makers for Group Jalen, which rallied from an early deficit not long after he explored the semifinals. Lively rapidly ended up an alley-oop and was 6-of-6 from the field in general, all around the rim.


Jordan Hawkins, New Orleans Pelicans
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 7 PTS|3-5 FG|5 REB|2 AST
Last: 5 PTS|2-2 FG|1-1 3PT|2 AST

Analysis
Perhaps the very best shooter in this year’s novice class, Hawkins showcased his ability with a set of pull-up 3-pointers in shift and ended up 5-of-7 throughout the competitors. More outstanding, nevertheless, was Hawkins’ playmaking. He discovered colleagues Walker Kessler and Dereck Lively II for alley-oop surfaces.


Walker Kessler, Utah Jazz
Grade: B

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-1 FG|2 REB|1 AST
Last: 4 PTS|2-2 FG|1 REB

Analysis
It was a sluggish start for Kessler, who was really required a prohibited screen in the semifinals– possibly the very first in All-Star Weekend history. Kessler did have an effective block because video game and a set of surfaces around the rim in the finals.


Group Detlef

Izan Almansa, G League Fire Up
Grade: B+

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-2 FG|1 REB|1 BLK
Last: 0 PTS|1 MINUTES

Analysis
The 18-year-old Almansa, No. 24 in ESPN’s draft rankings, saw the least action of any gamer on Group Detlef. Almansa still discovered time for an unforgettable series in which he knocked Bilal Coulibaly‘s shot, then raced downcourt for a dunk at the other end. Even worse was Almansa’s choice to contest Victor Wembanyama in shift, establishing a three-point play.


Matas Buzelis, G League Fire Up
Grade: B+

Video Game 1: 7 PTS|3-7 FG|2 REB|2 AST
Last: 0 PTS|0-3 FG|0-1 3PT|1 STL

Analysis

The highest-rated possibility on G League Fire Up at No. 6 in ESPN’s rankings, Buzelis sent out Group Detlef to the last by tearing down a hard turn-around jumper after a prolonged offending dry spell.

He likewise showcased his shotmaking by striking a step-back jumper with a high release and an objected to 3. That didn’t rollover to the last, where Buzelis missed out on all 3 of his shots and dribbled the ball off his foot for a turnover.


Emoni Bates, Cleveland Charge
Grade: B-

Video Game 1: 5 PTS|2-6 FG|2 AST|1 STL
Last: 2 PTS|1-3 FG|2 REB|1 AST

Analysis
Bates, who’s on a two-way agreement with the Cleveland Cavaliers, was active throughout. He had a remarkable surface in shift in the last and a long rainbow 3 off the dribble in the semifinals, when he likewise laid the ball off to colleague Oscar Tshiebwe for a dunk. In general, nevertheless, Bates shot simply 3-of-9 from the field.


Tyler Smith, G League Fire Up
Grade: C+

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-5 FG|3 REB|1 STL
Last: 0 PTS|0-1 FG|0-1 3PT

Analysis
Ranked 19th in ESPN’s draft rankings, Smith got his very first take a look at Victor Wembanyama with blended outcomes. Wembanyama took the ball from Smith while compared individually, then Smith later on attempted a hook shot over him and got foreseeable outcomes with a wild miss out on.


Mac McClung, Osceola Magic
Grade: A-

Video Game 1: 12 PTS|5-9 FG|5 REB|3 AST
Last: 0 PTS|0-1 3PT|3 AST

Analysis
It’s entertaining that McClung, who will safeguard his title in Saturday’s dunk contest regardless of not being signed to an NBA agreement (he’s betting the G League’s Osceola Magic), scored a game-high 12 points in the semifinals without a single dunk. Rather, McClung counted on hard layup surfaces. A miss out on after McClung was sent out to the line for a three-shot nasty postponed Group Detlef reaching the target rating, however it arrived in big part thanks to McClung’s energy, which produced 3 offending rebounds and 3 helps. He once again had 3 helps in the last.


Oscar Tshiebwe, Indiana Mad Ants
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-1 FG|8 REB
Last: 8 PTS|4-5 FG|2 REB|1 AST

Analysis
Representing the home town group on a two-way agreement with the Pacers, Tshiebwe remained in the mix throughout both video games. He took down a game-high 8 boards in the semifinals, consisting of 4 of them at the offending end. In the last, Tshiebwe discovered his footing as a scorer, making a tip-in to open the video game, soaking home a pick-and-roll feed and finishing a drop action for a layup.


Alondes Williams, Sioux Falls Skyforce
Grade: A-

Video Game 1: 11 PTS|5-10 FG|1-6 3PT|2 AST
Last: 3 PTS|1-1 3PT|1 REB|1 BLK

Analysis
Just recently signed to a two-way agreement by the Miami Heat, Williams impressed with his well-rounded play in the semifinals. He addressed Victor Wembanyama and came away with an and-1, then made an emphasize dunk in shift when he pulled the ball back before completing. Williams likewise struck a rainbow 3 over Wembanyama and was credited for a rating when he assaulted the offending glass and got Wembanyama to tip the ball into his own basket, and. in the last, Williams had as lots of turnovers as points (3 each).


Group Pau

Victor Wembanyama, San Antonio Spurs
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 11 PTS|5-6 FG|7 REB|2 BLK

Analysis

We can quibble with Wembanyama’s 5 turnovers, a few of them the outcome of reckless ball handling, however he still showcased the breadth of his distinctive abilities.

Wembanyama made 5 of his 6 shot efforts, the majority of them around the rim. That consisted of a shift dunk in which he waited on the defense to come to him, drawing an and-1 while doing so.

The leading choice of the 2023 draft then tossed a lob to Jaime Jaquez Jr. after running pick-and-roll, got a team-high 7 rebounds and had a set of blocks– among them eliminating a Mac McClung shot that might have ended the video game.


Brandon Miller, Charlotte Hornets
Grade: C

Video Game 1: 0 PTS|0-4 FG|2 REB|2 STL

Analysis
The No. 2 total choice from the 2023 draft has actually been hot recently, charging up our novice rankings, however his shooting touch deserted him Friday. Miller missed out on all 4 of his shot efforts, consisting of an air ball from 3 in shift that he restored by hustling back to take an outlet pass.


Brandin Podziemski, Golden State Warriors
Grade: B+

Video Game 1: 3 PTS|1-3 FG|4 AST|2 REB

Analysis
Thrust into the irregular function of point player on Group Pau, Podziemski tape-recorded a team-high 4 helps. He established Victor Wembanyama with a good entry pass and after that had a drop pass to Bilal Coulibaly for a dunk. Podziemski’s only basket was a step-back 3.


Jaime Jaquez Jr, Miami Heat
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 6 PTS|3-4 FG|3 AST|2 REB

Analysis
Jaquez’s strong novice project rollovered into Friday. A pump phony that established a drive and dunk was the peak of a night that saw Jaquez make 3 of his 4 shot efforts and distribute 3 helps.


Jabari Smith Jr, Houston Rockets
Grade: B-

Video Game 1: 4 PTS|2-4 FG|1 REB

Analysis
Smith had simply one board in 9 peaceful minutes. He scored 2 of his 4 points early, increasing over his protector to tear down a jumper from the nasty line.


Cason Wallace, Oklahoma City Thunder
Grade: B-

Video Game 1: 8 PTS|3-8 FG|2-6 3PT|1 AST

Analysis
Group Pau consistently turned to Wallace in requirement of threes down the stretch, and he went simply 2-of-6 beyond the arc. Among those makes was a high-arcing shot from the corner. Wallace likewise transformed his own take into a mini-windmill dunk.


Bilal Coulibaly, Washington Wizards
Grade: B

Video Game 1: 4 PTS|2-3 FG|1 AST|1 STL

Analysis
A client drive for a layup followed by a strip for a take in a crucial circumstance was Coulibaly’s finest series. Sadly, he was on the incorrect end of Izan Almansa’s emphasize block.


Group Tamika

Paolo Banchero, Orlando Magic
Grade: B

Video Game 1: 5 PTS|2-7 FG|0-4 3PT|3 REB

Analysis
Banchero assisted Group Tamika’s dominant start with a reverse dunk in shift and had a good driving dunk, however he had a hard time from beyond the arc. Banchero missed out on all 4 of his 3-point efforts, consisting of a step-back that lost of the rim. Banchero will have a possibility to discover his touch in Sunday’s All-Star Video game.


Jaden Ivey, Detroit Pistons
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 8 PTS|4-7 FG|4 STL|3 REB

Analysis
Ivey wound up on the incorrect end of what became an individually fight with Bennedict Mathurin, who was prepared one choice after Ivey in 2022, yet still acquitted himself well. Ivey was aggressive assaulting the basket with power and scored 8 points on 4-of-7 shooting in addition to taping a game-high 4 takes.


Jalen Duren, Detroit Pistons
Grade: C

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-4 FG|1 REB|1 STL

Analysis
Duren, who is shooting 63% from the field, had his least precise trip of the whole season (1-of-4). Duren’s sole basket came when he displayed his ballhandling capability outdoors court for a dunk, and he had a good pass to establish a missed out on corner 3, however for one of the most part it was a peaceful night.


Keegan Murray, Sacramento Kings
Grade: B+

Video Game 1: 5 PTS|2-4 FG|3 REB|2 AST

Analysis
Murray’s pull-up 3 in shift belonged to Group Tamika’s 10-0 go to begin the video game. Although he scored just one other basket, Murray connected for team-high bestow 3 rebounds and 2 helps.


Scoot Henderson, Portland Path Sports Jackets
Grade: A

Video Game 1: 10 PTS|4-6 FG|1-2 3PT|1 AST

Analysis
Playing in an unmatched 3rd successive Increasing Stars video game after representing G League Fire up the previous 2 years, Henderson brought out energy, periodically playing full-court defense on opposing ball handlers. He could not end up a dunk after developing a take, however he later on finished an and-1 over Walker Kessler after getting to the rim with a remarkable in-and-out dribble. Henderson’s 10 points led his group.


Keyonte George, Utah Jazz
Grade: B

Video Game 1: 2 PTS|1-4 FG|1 STL|1 BLK

Analysis
By scoring a reverse surface over Jazz colleague Walker Kessler, George had among the night’s most remarkable highlights. That was George’s only basket, as he missed out on all 3 attempts beyond the arc. He did impress on defense, taking a backdoor pass and removing Bennedict Mathurin


Vince Williams Jr, Memphis Grizzlies
Grade: B

Video Game 1: 3 PTS|1-2 3PT|2 AST|1 STL

Analysis
A last-minute replacement for the hurt Dyson Daniels, Williams made a pull-up 3 in shift for his only basket of the night.


Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: